4 ms·
The best way to avoid any such issue is to contribute changes to the upstream project, which is our goal with the choice of license. We're hoping for a centrali
by philippemnoel 2y ago
The best way to avoid any such issue is to contribute changes to the upstream project, which is our goal with the choice of license. We're hoping for a centralized ParadeDB project from which everyone can benefit.
- gspr 2y ago> The best way to avoid any such issue is to contribute changes to the upstream project, which is our goal with the choice of license. This I understand. But it doesn't really address Martin's worry about an accidental modification. Or apparent confusion about what constitutes modification.
- myworkinisgood 2y agoThere's no accidental modification. > Not true. There is no need to accept the license if you exercise only your statutory rights, which in many jurisdictions includes the right to run the program and to patch it if necessary (e.g., for compatibility with other programs).
- gspr 2y agoInteresting. Do you have any clarification about which these "many" jurisdictions are? Like, can we expect this to be the case in most of the world?