3 ms·
That one image is probably far more useful to the person loading the webpage than the hundreds of MBs of JS. It's best to reduce the size of images, but even d
by autoexec 2y ago
That one image is probably far more useful to the person loading the webpage than the hundreds of MBs of JS.
It's best to reduce the size of images, but even doing that everywhere won't make the bloat of mostly useless JS any better.