Not every death is the result of criminal action. At best, you might find some argument for criminally negligent behavior, but that's going to probably be a pre

Not every death is the result of criminal action. At best, you might find some argument for criminally negligent behavior, but that's going to probably be a pretty big reach for the landlord of a 3rd party restaurant in a mall. Criminal negligence usually requires the accused to have engaged in conduct that they knew (or reasonably should have known) would put someone in danger. Even if you say that republishing the 3rd party's menu or even collaborating on that menu extends the civil liability to Disney, I'm having a hard time imagining any argument that those actions could be reasonably known to endanger someone without some evidence that the restaurant had no allergen policies or procedures and that Disney knew that and still placed wording to imply they did.