3 ms·
> would be to have never interacted with Disney at all in any way Yes, that is the PR risk. How much will Disney save in this one case, against the background
by brookst 2y ago
> would be to have never interacted with Disney at all in any way
Yes, that is the PR risk. How much will Disney save in this one case, against the background meme of "if you ever watch anything Disney they are free to kill you" (that's not accurate, but memes rarely are).
IMO this is lawyers finding a local maximum that is bad for the company in general.
- exe34 2y agoyou say it's not accurate, but that's exactly what they are claiming here. worse, the woman they killed never even had Disney+. it's like they murder somebody, but the prosecutor once had Disney+ - boom, immunity.