5 ms·
That it didn't exist is not really that relvant. I.e. the US classified secrecy as a munition so under the US' framing it is a 2nd amendment right necessary to
by dogsledsleddog 2y ago
That it didn't exist is not really that relvant. I.e. the US classified secrecy as a munition so under the US' framing it is a 2nd amendment right necessary to balance power between people and government.. Take it away from all and it is no longer essential.
- some_random 2y agoHas this framing ever actually been tested in court? Between the dramatic re-interpretation of the 2nd as a collective non-right and the precedent of laws like ITAR and other munitions controls I can't imagine this would hold up.
- arminiusreturns 2y agoRemember the 90s cryptowars and the "illegal shirts with math on them"?
- some_random 2y agoYeah that was largely about export controls vs freedom of speech, I don't know of any actual court case involving the second amendment a la https://xkcd.com/504/ https://xkcd.com/504/
- xhkkffbf 2y agoHas anyone used the 3rd amendment to argue against the government forcing them to include backdoors and surveillance mechanisms?