3 ms·
> the wrong time Would you consider lack of marriage stability as a reason to not have kids yet?
by nashashmi 2y ago
> the wrong time
Would you consider lack of marriage stability as a reason to not have kids yet?
- thisOtterBeGood 2y agoNo. We have two kids and have been agreeing on a third. There are no rational arguments for another child: We will sacrifice sleep, money, self-entertainment. It always results in more work for parents.
- benterix 2y agoDefinitely. I believe most people would see the "wrong time" as lack of financial stability. Not being able to depend on a partner is a recipe for a broken family and not a very happy lifer for the child (first-hand experience).
- seanw444 2y agoYeah. I was mostly directing that towards the "the world is going to shit" crowd. I'm also a part of that crowd, but it irks me when people think we're in a unique situation. The world's always been going to shit. It goes to shit in rather short cycles.
- trilbyglens 2y agoprevious "going to shit" cycles didn't have the possibility of ending the habitable era of our planet.
- nashashmi 2y agoUnfortunately for the dooms day warners this is a hypothesis. Not a scientific fact. We actually have no clue how the earth will cope with rising temperatures. Remember in the era of the rise of civilizations, earth was five degrees warmer than today. So we will be fine now and later