3 ms·
idk, to me it seems like no matter what this is a lose/lose situation for disney. either way it's bad press, which granted doesn't mean much in the long run a
by TheIronBird 2y ago
idk, to me it seems like no matter what this is a lose/lose situation for disney.
either way it's bad press, which granted doesn't mean much in the long run
assuming the motion to dismiss is denied and it moves forward, regardless of which way it is eventually ruled, doesn't this eventually open it up for federal courts to rule all forced arbitration agreements in T&C's void?
(or more likely assuming they rule against disney, limit them to less severe crimes)
though that the widow is willing/able to move forward with appeals process, the latter of which likely won't be possible without some civil rights activists group stepping in to provide pro bono legal assistance
a settlement seems unlikely, since the widow only went forward with this case because Disney refused a 50k settlement, the cheap bastards. They are almost certainly spending more on lawyer fees than it would have cost them to settle this out of court