At least two strategies of reply: 1) choose problems P1..n such that they have yes/no answers; 2) rephrase my argument to consider max-tokens given any prompt.

At least two strategies of reply: 1) choose problems P1..n such that they have yes/no answers; 2) rephrase my argument to consider max-tokens given any prompt. But I think you could see these yourself, so I'm at a loss as to what the purpose of this game is. What is the motivation to insist that animal cognition consists of some process similar to compressing 1PB of books into frequency associations and computing a conditional probability? Is it some desire to believe one hasnt been duped by the technology? "No no, I am no fool, it really is real!" etc. ? Or wishfullfilment of some other sort? Or just the cynical view that if one is nihilistic about people one is most likely right? (Each, of course, a pseudoscience of its own sort).