2 ms·
It is important to remember the details here. Disney dont run the restuarant, they are just the landlord. The customer didnt pay anything to disney, they just
by alt227 2y ago
It is important to remember the details here.
Disney dont run the restuarant, they are just the landlord.
The customer didnt pay anything to disney, they just visited a restuarant at a freely open Mall which happened to be owned by disney.
The only reason this person is trying to sue disney is because the disney mall website republished the menu of the restuarant which said 'Allergen Free' on it.
The absurd counter repsonse from disney is just their way of drawing attention to the fact that the original case is just as absurd.
Why are they suing Disney when they had nothing to do with the food served, the staff serving it, or even the company that runs the restuarant?
- yieldcrv 2y agoIf they want a summary judgement they could just start off by pointing those things out, like not being an accurate defendant. Maybe they did in the actual court filing and the rest is just “but if we are a defendant here’s some other ways we covered our ass” I’m going to go look. Id feel a lot better if the media is the problem here