4 ms·
I don't "get" Vice's articles.
by zalew 14y ago
I don't "get" Vice's articles.
- mcantelon 14y agoVice occasionally has some good stuff, but this is pretty vapid. Most of the art world is crap. Most of anything is crap. Not a recent development.
- zalew 14y agoMost of their written stuff I came across was some rather shallow critiques with a few f-bombs here and there, like they pretend they don't care but makes it look like they care too much. I liked their 'Vice guide to...' travel documentaries though.
- mcantelon 14y agoYeah, I enjoyed them a lot years ago but it seems like they could be in a bit of a rut. Their travel documentaries are indeed pretty great.
- mxxx 14y agoBeing flippant about contemporary art is about as easy as it gets. "Hey, look, this Rothko idiot just put a bunch of red on a canvas. What a tool." Perhaps I don't 'get' VICE. (edit) although having said that, art openings are one of my least favourite things imaginable. I just don't blog about them afterwards.
- dotBen 14y agoVice magazine is a curious beast, aspiring somewhere intellectually higher than Maxim or FHM but more casual and less stuffy than GQ. But for any geeks/intelectual types (most HN'ers I'd assume) it's not going to push your boundaries given that it's having to aim at a some-what mass-market appeal. As it goes, I still find some of it to an enjoyable and thought provoking read at times