2 ms·
> Disney claims Piccolo reportedly agreed to this in 2019 when signing up for a one-month free trial of the streaming service on his PlayStation console. Okay
by yieldcrv 2y ago
> Disney claims Piccolo reportedly agreed to this in 2019 when signing up for a one-month free trial of the streaming service on his PlayStation console.
Okay this is full blown dystopia, the onion couldnt even make this up
Christ, she even self administered an epipen, was transported to a hospital and died anyway
This is a nightmare like, just be a human Disney, there are so many humans involved here
- alt227 2y agoIt is important to remember the details here. Disney dont run the restuarant, they are just the landlord. The customer didnt pay anything to disney, they just visited a restuarant at a freely open Mall which happened to be owned by disney. The only reason this person is trying to sue disney is because the disney mall website republished the menu of the restuarant which said 'Allergen Free' on it. The absurd counter repsonse from disney is just their way of drawing attention to the fact that the original case is just as absurd. Why are they suing Disney when they had nothing to do with the food served, the staff serving it, or even the company that runs the restuarant?
- yieldcrv 2y agoIf they want a summary judgement they could just start off by pointing those things out, like not being an accurate defendant. Maybe they did in the actual court filing and the rest is just “but if we are a defendant here’s some other ways we covered our ass” I’m going to go look. Id feel a lot better if the media is the problem here