3 ms·
This News day article is disingenuous. If you look at the filing (someone else in the thread has posted the documents), Disney is saying that the husband bought
by tsimionescu 2y ago
This News day article is disingenuous. If you look at the filing (someone else in the thread has posted the documents), Disney is saying that the husband bought the tickets to Disneyland (where the restaurant is, and without which they couldn't have accessed it) using his Disney+ account, and that the ticket purchase includes terms that he explicitly agreed to which re-iterate that the Disney+ terms of use apply as well. So there is some plausible argument that the terms apply to services they received at Disneyland, it's not "yes, but he has also subscribed to our streaming service".
I still hope that this doesn't pass muster - your right to seek a lawsuit for grievous injury or death shouldn't be covered by some checkbox you clicked on a site.
- _djo_ 2y agoThat's incorrect, the restaurant is at Disney Springs which is a mall outside Disney's parks and doesn't require tickets. [0][1] [0]https://touringplans.com/blog/disney-in-a-minute-what-is-disney-springs/ https://touringplans.com/blog/disney-in-a-minute-what-is-dis... [1]https://www.disneysprings.com/dining/ https://www.disneysprings.com/dining/
- tsimionescu 2y agoOh, you're right and I was completely wrong. So Disney really is just trying to hold someone to a contract for a completely unrelated service...
- fortran77 2y agoDon't spread misinformation. The fact is don't need a park ticket to enter Raglin Road. It's on WDW property, but it's outside a park gate.