3 ms·
> The reason being that many of our institutions, and especially our courts, are nigh-hopelessly corrupt. The reason being that Flint's water crisis was caused
by AnthonyMouse 2y ago
> The reason being that many of our institutions, and especially our courts, are nigh-hopelessly corrupt.
The reason being that Flint's water crisis was caused by the government not adding corrosion inhibitors to the water when they switched to another water source, which stripped the lining from the lead pipes, causing them to permanently leach lead into the water. They basically ruined the city's entire water grid all at once and caused hundreds of millions in damage because all of the pipes had to be inspected and replaced. Which takes a long time to do.
More to the point, it was the executive branch that did this! You can hardly blame the courts for the actions of the Governor and his underlings.
- krapp 2y agoBut why didn't anyone simply go to Congress and use their persuasion and words?
- AnthonyMouse 2y agoCongress did actually approve a buttload of money, not long after it happened. It just takes a long time to dig up that many pipes.
- underlipton 2y agoThe mistakes that lead to the corrosion were caused by a careless political wrangling overseen by a series of appointed managers and boards, essentially judges in all but name. Even if you don't see it that way, the point is that the protests of concerned citizens did little to stay the hands of the people empowered to make stupid mistakes quickly. Further, they dragged their heels on pipe-replacement, maintaining for years that it would be unnecessary. The actual, physical replacement could have been done much faster. Fixing these problems in a timely manner would require more fundamental changes to how they're handled, not simply better organization and awareness within the current paradigm.