13 ms·
But it has nothing to do with Haskell in particular... to most people, this just means greater than, lambda, equal to. This is doubly confusing, because >= usua
by andreyf 18y ago
But it has nothing to do with Haskell in particular... to most people, this just means greater than, lambda, equal to. This is doubly confusing, because >= usually means "greater than or equal to".
I agree that simplicity is very important, I like this one best: http://haskell.org/sitewiki/images/2/21/Haskell-apankrat.png http://haskell.org/sitewiki/images/2/21/Haskell-apankrat.png
- brl 18y agoIt's not '>=' it's '>>=' the Haskell monad binding operator. (I also agree, that logo is pure awesomeness)
- andreyf 18y agoI know, but most people don't. Your logo can't be designed only for people who know the language. Most people think >λ= means "greater than" "lambda" "equals", not a clever play on monad binding op and lambda...
- alxv 18y agoPerhaps you are right that for most people the logo is meaningless. However, I find it looks like a fusion of >>= (Haskell's binding operator) and λ (the symbol of functional programming).