3 ms·
If you have a solution to comprehensive legislative capture at both state and federal levels in your back pocket by all means whip it out. Until one materialize
by forgetfreeman 2y ago
If you have a solution to comprehensive legislative capture at both state and federal levels in your back pocket by all means whip it out. Until one materializes that "hack" as you call it was the most effective method for government agencies to actually do their jobs.
- akira2501 2y ago> If you have a solution to comprehensive legislative capture at both state and federal levels in your back pocket by all means whip it out. The capture is obviously not comprehensive, it's de jure, and fatalist attitudes like yours I suspect as being part of the problem here. It seems to me you're not actually interested in a solution, one which you could easily imagine for yourself just as I can, but you're interested in doing precisely what I worried about above. There are people who apparently _prefer_ the gridlock instead of being involved with their own government on any level. It truly is amazing to me. > Until one materializes that "hack" as you call it Since you speak the language of the bully, then please explain to me the utterly exigent issues that will befall us if we fail to obey basic constitutional law? > most effective method for government agencies to actually do their jobs. Government agencies are not entitled to determine what their job is. That is the role of Congress. This is why the "Due Care" clause exists. This is a democracy not a state of administrative convenience.
- Yizahi 2y agoDismantle first past the post system everywhere. There, super simple and effective.
- forgetfreeman 2y agoNow you just have to get thoroughly captured legislative bodies to sign on to your reforms...