3 ms·

> Chevron has been zombie precedent for years. Where do you get this bullshit? "Chevron" was not a zombie precedent, it was very much the defining factor of th

> Chevron has been zombie precedent for years. Where do you get this bullshit? "Chevron" was not a zombie precedent, it was very much the defining factor of the US administrative state.

jhawk28 2y ago
A quick google search can quickly find how the legal community has viewed chevron as zombie precedent... Zombie Chevron: A Celebration [https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-01/10.Sunstein_v82-4_565-584.pdf https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-01/10.Sun...] Gorsuch Says "Chevron Doctrine" is Dead Even Though the US Supreme Court Refuses to Say So [https://www.afslaw.com/perspectives/environmental-law-advisor/gorsuch-says-chevron-doctrine-dead-even-though-the-us https://www.afslaw.com/perspectives/environmental-law-adviso...]
- cyberax 2y ago
  Chevron deference has been cited in more than 18,000 Federal lawsuits. It was NOT a zombie doctrine. It had actively been used, all the way to the recent decision.
- e40 2y ago
  That “proof” is merely people that hated Chevron calling it a zombie.