3 ms·
> A more likely future is less video You mean I could get a f...ing text again about things, which I could just read at my own speed, skip back and forth by ju
by pino82 2y ago
> A more likely future is less video
You mean I could get a f...ing text again about things, which I could just read at my own speed, skip back and forth by just moving my eyes, use the search function, skip pieces of it, etc etc, in just two minutes instead of ten minutes watching a video clip for the most trivial statements?
What a baaad world that would be...
- johnnyanmac 2y ago>You mean I could get a f...ing text again about things Tone aside, we already do that... it's also monetized and being AI-slopified as we speak. Much faster than video. in this scenario where videos become non-viable, people would ujst paywall their text like many journalists have resorted to. There's no free lunch these days.
- kalleboo 2y agoThe videos aren't going to be replaced with text, they're going to be replaced with nothing. Text died because it is too hard to get paid for, banner ads paid peanuts to begin with and are now trivial to block. Video ads paid really well which is why people started making video content, if video ads also die, then there is simply going to be no content.
- maxglute 2y agoThere's going to be less content, which will likely still be more than enough content.