5 ms·
> Great job Go. Hat tip and respect for this Whoah. Easy there cowboy. It was not opt-in when originally announced. After an extended, shall we say, "lively"
by traceroute66 2y ago
> Great job Go. Hat tip and respect for this
Whoah. Easy there cowboy.
It was not opt-in when originally announced.
After an extended, shall we say, "lively" discussion on Github[1], they did the right thing and made it opt-in.
(N.B. The discussion was heavily moderated and redacted, it was even more "lively" at the time.)
[1]https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/58409 https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/58409
- minkles 2y ago[flagged]
- etse 2y agoAre you opposed to the process by which discussion can initiate a transition from negative state to positive state? Seems healthy to me.
- synicalx 2y agoTo me, even proposing the (extremely obviously) negative state in the first place is a sign of bad faith on the part of the proposer. If they proposed kicking puppies twice a day, and after some discussion decided to not do that would we all be applauding their decision?