>How do you explain nail houses in China then? A private entity trying to buy a private entity is not the same as the Chinese government taking or using the la

>How do you explain nail houses in China then? A private entity trying to buy a private entity is not the same as the Chinese government taking or using the land they, the state, owns: "According to the Constitution, land in cities is owned by the State; land in the rural and suburban areas is owned by the State or by collectives. (Constitution, art. 10.) Although individuals cannot privately own land, they may obtain transferable land-use rights for a number of years for a fee."[0] Any chance your bold assertion is something you just pulled out of the air? [0] https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2015/03/chinese-law-on-private-ownership-of-real-property/ https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2015/03/chinese-law-on-private-own...