The two linked articles http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=3 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25

The two linked articles http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=3 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-fr... being David Alpert's review of Lawrence Kraus's book, and http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/has-physics-made-philosophy-and-religion-obsolete/256203/ http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/has-ph... being an interview in which Kraus responds to the charges, are far more interesting than this piece of borderline-blogspam, which claims to settle the question merely by overstating what Kraus originally said (I don't think he ever claimed that physics subsumes all of philosophy, only some areas).