2 ms·
In this context, Chrome is just a browser, just like Safari is on iOS. The "problem" is less-technically-savvy folks (especially -- and ironically -- tech nativ
by inanutshellus 2y ago
In this context, Chrome is just a browser, just like Safari is on iOS. The "problem" is less-technically-savvy folks (especially -- and ironically -- tech native youth) don't understand/care about the distinction between Apps vs a Website Bookmark/Shortcut.
That Patreon is even considering keeping the app is proof of this.
Depending on how overt Patreon's app is about ringing the alarm bells (imagine a "JUST MAKE A SHORTCUT and save 30% on everything!!!" popup) would just get them banned too, no doubt. Presumably criticizing Apple is a bannable offense.
- krger 2y ago>That Patreon is even considering keeping the app is proof of this. No, that Patreon is "even considering" keeping the app is evidence that they get more valuable information about users and their habits from the app than they could from a website.
- inanutshellus 2y agoThat's not disagreeing with me, but instead adding yet another argument for users to avoid as many Apps as they can. If the experience in an app is form, graphs, and payments... use the website. It apparently saves that company 30% and, to your point, keeps your computing habits yours.
- meowster 2y agoI doubt it. What evidence supports your claim? I took a look at the Patreon app permissions in Android, and it doesn't even ask for location which is probably the most valuable thing about users they could ask for.
- inanutshellus 2y agoThe broad argument holds, regardless of what Patreon itself does right now. Facts are simple here: Apps grant easier access your habits and identity as compared to a relatively-sandboxed browser.