4 ms·
I’m really impressed at the number of times they say their counterparts responded to their report in under an hour, immediately took the affected site offline,
by alwa 2y ago
I’m really impressed at the number of times they say their counterparts responded to their report in under an hour, immediately took the affected site offline, then resolved the issue quickly.
That seems like an enviable operation.
- jollofricepeas 2y agoYou almost have to pull the site to stroke bounty hunter egos when you could just push a change to prod instead. If not, they are quick to bash you publicly. There’s too much hubris in the “professional” web app bug hunter community. Generally, their attitude is very “look at these stupid developers,” “developers suck at security,” or “a conspiracy is happening because company X didn’t take their app down within 10 minutes of getting my email.” It’s much more nuanced than that. I’d like to see: 1) more bounties and better paid bounties 2) less ego and much more professionalism and patience from “researchers” Both would be better for consumers.
- hansvm 2y ago> when you could just push a change to prod instead. I wonder if there's an attack vector hiding where you induce a malicious bug via an illegitimate bounty and the developers' bias against inaction.
- azeirah 2y ago100%, hacking is as much technical prowess as it is social engineering.
- Thorrez 2y agoHow about this one: https://hackerone.com/reports/745324 https://hackerone.com/reports/745324 It's a $20k bounty for simply taking a cookie that a HackerOne employee accidentally pasted when responding to a different vuln report on HackerOne.
- joatmon-snoo 2y agoSeriously! I actually can’t think of any openly documented security incident with such impressive remediation timelines. There’s a lot that has to go into fixing things on such a tight timeline too: - oncall-level alerting for your security.txt inbox - your oncall needs to either be someone who can actually take corrective action on the system in question (not easy in a large company!) or able to route the issue to the right team - the service owners need to be empowered to treat security with the appropriate severity (taking the site down so quickly speaks highly to this) Hats off to the points.com team. With any luck, this post doesn’t get too much traction and y’all won’t get flooded with bounty beggar spam.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- michaelt 2y ago> - oncall-level alerting for your security.txt inbox Maybe the terminology is different in your company, but my employer has an 'operations' team which has several shifts of workers, who look after things that need 24/7 monitoring. They then triage and escalate as appropriate. That's who you'd have monitoring the security inbox, if you want round-the-clock monitoring, so nobody's getting woken several times a night by spam.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- seanthemon 2y agoWe call that guy grafana alerts at ours
- TrackerFF 2y agoMakes me wonder if they (points.com) have some key-word alerts on incoming emails. I know for sure that at some companies, this would have taken hours (to days!) to detect, if the tip had come through a regular info@ or contact@ inbox.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- bakje 2y agoThe article mentions a security.txt[1] which doesn't seem to contain an email address but it does contain a link[2] to a disclosure program, I'm guessing that's how they submitted all their findings? [1] https://www.points.com/.well-known/security.txt https://www.points.com/.well-known/security.txt [2] https://bugcrowd.com/plusgrade-vdp-pro https://bugcrowd.com/plusgrade-vdp-pro
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- remus 2y agoIt's a strange disconnect between the quality of the incident response and the extremely basic nature of many of the bugs reported. I mean SECRET_KEY='secret'?! Seriously straightforward stuff.
- toyg 2y agoWhy? One depends on development practices, the other on security-team practices. You can have a team of donkeys building a product and the sharpest hackers guarding it. Ideally best practices would trickle down, but that's not a given.
- remus 2y ago> You can have a team of donkeys building a product and the sharpest hackers guarding it. You could do but it's a pretty risky way to run a business. Obviously the real world often gets in the way, but a competent manager would look at that org structure and say "shouldn't we move some of those smart ppl on to the build team to catch issues before they're in prod? Seems awfully risky waiting until it's live to catch these bugs which could cause us massive financial harm"
- jmb99 2y agoFrom experience, a lot of talent security people really just don’t want to be developers, even if they’re good at it. It’s not always as simple as shuffling people around between teams.
- udev4096 2y agoWhy would anyone even use such a predictable word for dev environment? I am baffled by this practice of not following the bare minimum security mindset even when you are just running it in a dev environment
- fragmede 2y agoBecause it's dev. Does your bathroom door have a deadbolt and a key and you lock it firmly every single time when you're home alone?
- diggan 2y agoIt seems they reacted before the team even sent over a report in one case: > Before we could even finish sending our report or see if other endpoints were accessible (e.g. adding points to a customer rewards account), the points.com team had detected our testing and had completely shut down United's production points.com website. Bummer!