3 ms·
You know, putting the merits of the Draft RFC aside, at least this was submitted as an RFC and they didn't just go ahead and unilaterally do this. This way, the
by mbreese 14y ago
You know, putting the merits of the Draft RFC aside, at least this was submitted as an RFC and they didn't just go ahead and unilaterally do this. This way, the RFC can be properly ignored. Or, on the other hand, when China completely disappears from the Internet and starts using its own DNS root system, we'll at least know what they are doing.
- dsrguru 14y agoKeep in mind this was proposed by someone at a business school and two people who work at phone companies, not by government officials.
- icebraining 14y ago'though they are all government employees, indirectly.
- Volpe 14y agoNo, they aren't. Working for a government owned company is not working for the government. They can have no affiliation with the CCP (which isn't possible if you work for a government department).
- olalonde 14y agoWhat distinction do you make between the Chinese government and the CCP? Aren't they pretty much the same thing?
- Volpe 14y agoThey are the same thing. Government owned companies are not "part of the government" like government departments are. The CEO's and directors are probably all members of the party, but labelling every employee as a party member running the party agenda is false. There are even 'members' (large numbers) of the party who do not agree/encourage the party agenda.