3 ms·

I mean, 0xDDDB00B5 is about as appropriate in a codebase as 0xB166D1C5 or 0x73571C23 would be. Which is to say, it isn’t.

• l33t7332273 2y ago
  What objectionable thing is 0x73571C23 supposed to be?
  • tbrownaw 2y ago
    nuts
  • handojin 2y ago
    Testicle. It's a small unit test.
    • tbrownaw 2y ago
      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ickle https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ickle Huh, cool.
  • gymbeaux 2y ago
    TESTICLE I believe
• g15jv2dp 2y ago
  You're offended if someone wrote "testicle" in source code? Are you also offended about "ankle" or "hair"? The puritanism...
  • nequo 2y ago
    I’m not offended. It is unprofessional. Talking about sex at a workplace that is not about sex is going to be offputting to many people who are not there to have sex.
    • g15jv2dp 2y ago
      The mere mention of the word "testicle" makes you think that your coworkers want to have sex with you? Wow.
      • nequo 2y ago
        Have you tried talking about testicles in a work meeting? Genuine question.
        • g15jv2dp 2y ago
          There's a difference between "talking about it" and "the word is uttered somehow at some point".
          • nequo 2y ago
            A constant in a codebase is not “uttered somehow at some point.” It is a fixture for everyone to see until it is changed by another commit.