4 ms·
0xDDDB00B5
by rr808 2y ago
0xDDDB00B5
- bitwize 2y agoThat's a Code of Conduct violation. It's not the 90s anymore, there's no quarter for this type of thing in modern development teams. Rust's style checker even flags up the use problematic magic numbers.
- steveklabnik 2y agoThis is only for rustc, not for arbitrary rust programs.
- cpburns2009 2y agoWouldn't rustc flagging "problematic" numbers prevent arbitrary rust programs from having them in the source?
- bitwize 2y agoHe means that the style checker only checks for those sorts of numbers in the source code to rustc. But the point remains: there is far, far less tolerance for the sort of humor that objectifies women today, and even laughing at it can get you in trouble as Tim Peters recently found out.
- nequo 2y agoI mean, 0xDDDB00B5 is about as appropriate in a codebase as 0xB166D1C5 or 0x73571C23 would be. Which is to say, it isn’t.
- l33t7332273 2y agoWhat objectionable thing is 0x73571C23 supposed to be?
- g15jv2dp 2y agoYou're offended if someone wrote "testicle" in source code? Are you also offended about "ankle" or "hair"? The puritanism...
- nequo 2y agoI’m not offended. It is unprofessional. Talking about sex at a workplace that is not about sex is going to be offputting to many people who are not there to have sex.
- aeonik 2y agoExcuse me, but men can have boobs too.
- steveklabnik 2y agoNo. These tests are part of rustc’s tests, not part of anything that runs for arbitrary Rust programs.
- lkj34l34 2y ago[dead]