No, it's really not. http://architecture-history.org/schools/BRUTALISM.html http://architecture-history.org/schools/BRUTALISM.html > the Brutalist apothegm “A

No, it's really not. http://architecture-history.org/schools/BRUTALISM.html http://architecture-history.org/schools/BRUTALISM.html > the Brutalist apothegm “An ethic, not an aesthetic” acquired significance. Explicitly held aesthetic appeal as a non-goal. From day one it has always been identified as "bold", "provocative", and "radical". These arguments for brutalism -- since day one -- are literally describing its lack of harmony in time and place.