4 ms·
Damn. 30% to apple, 30% to patreon, 30% to government that leaves you with 0.7^3 = 0.343 = 34.3%. I mean pretty much every part of this is incorrect. Lets sa
by stahtops 2y ago
Damn. 30% to apple, 30% to patreon, 30% to government that leaves you with 0.7^3 = 0.343 = 34.3%.
I mean pretty much every part of this is incorrect.
Lets say they are single in the USA and made $150k on Patreon:
(12% * 47150)+(22% * (100525-47151)) + (24% * (150000-100526)) = $29,3000 -> 20%
<https://support.patreon.com/hc/article_attachments/28849202071565 https://support.patreon.com/hc/article_attachments/288492020...>
WEB
* $10.00 sale -> $0.80 Patreon + 0.59 Fee, $0.00 to Apple, $6.89 to creator, $1.72 to gov't [FED]
* $10.00 sale -> $0.80 Patreon + 0.59 Fee, $0.00 to Apple, $6.02 to creator, $2.58 to gov't [FED+10% State]
IAP + default price bump
* $14.50 sale -> $1.15 Patreon + 0.00 Fee, $4.35 to Apple, $7.19 to creator, $1.80 to gov't [FED]
* $14.50 sale -> $1.16 Patreon + 0.00 Fee, $4.35 to Apple, $6.29 to creator, $2.70 to gov't [FED+10% State]
Users who care about the cost increase will go to the website. The others will pay in app and be stoked that they can just go to one place to cancel any iOS subscription. If they use their Apple Card, they can literally click any transaction in the Wallet app to see exactly what sub they were charged for.
- Terretta 2y ago> stoked that they can just go to one place to cancel any iOS subscription So much of these anti-console anti-appliance threads boil down to: Value-adding experiences consumers want enough to pay for (such as peace of mind that anything bought here can be cancelled no questions asked) should be prohibited, because I don't want to offer that experience.
- lern_too_spel 2y agoIf consumers really want to pay that much more for that convenience, why won't Apple allow the merchant to say that the price is lower elsewhere?
- Jensson 2y agoApple is allowed to offer that feature, Apple isn't allowed to force you to buy that feature (depending on jurisdiction).