2 ms·
That's because there's the actual texas environmental report doesn't claim high levels of mercury in the samples. The high level comes from a typo of putting th
by mlindner 2y ago
That's because there's the actual texas environmental report doesn't claim high levels of mercury in the samples. The high level comes from a typo of putting the decimal point in the wrong spot.
https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/t...
- credit_guy 2y agoYou're linking a 483 page document, and I have no idea what typo you are referring to. Can you be more specific?
- mlindner 2y agoThe article claims 113 micrograms per liter, the document claims "<0.113" micrograms per liter. Page 177. Also called "Report Page 20 of 71". RL stands for "Reporting Limit".
- DerekL 2y agoIt looks like page 79 of that doc has a typo. It says mercury in sample 1 is 113 µg/L. Maybe they meant 0.113.
- lern_too_spel 2y agoIt was supposed to say <.113 µg/L.