3 ms·
> don't think inventing your own terms (Which therefore have extremely weak embeddings to match with the embeddings of the models training content) Well put, i
by Bluestein 2y ago
> don't think inventing your own terms (Which therefore have extremely weak embeddings to match with the embeddings of the models training content)
Well put, in that, that was - in essence - what I was concerned with, with that term.-
- samstave 2y agoFor me: in-head-logic is so FN weird when you attempt to speak it out loud. It makes the brilliant idiots and idiots brilliant! (what is best to capture logic?) --- Honestly guys - I am doing my best. But I do so with as an is-much informed place as I can... (this is why I always give benefit of the doubt ((I dont know the concept I amy be conveying)) HALP)
- Bluestein 2y ago> (what is best to capture logic?) - Either formal logic notation or a state machine? (Depending on what you intend by 'logic' and 'capture' ...) PS. A Karnaugh map might be of help. As an added bonus, you get to simplify things.-