4 ms·
How is that insulting to the judge? If you have 27% you could be the single biggest player in a given market and exercise monopoly-like control. Especially cons
by bix6 2y ago
How is that insulting to the judge? If you have 27% you could be the single biggest player in a given market and exercise monopoly-like control. Especially considering all the colluding occurring.
- bilbo0s 2y ago* If you have 27% you could be the single biggest player in a given market* Not if your competitor, android, controls 70% of the market. That's what I meant about being insulting. In court, when we're making these kinds of claims, we shouldn't talk about what could be, we must talk about what is.