> Going into a court of law and saying that a company with 27% market share in phones and 13% market share in PCs is a "monopoly" Usually courts don't care abo

> Going into a court of law and saying that a company with 27% market share in phones and 13% market share in PCs is a "monopoly" Usually courts don't care about their global market share but their local market share, which IIRC in the US for mobile was somewhere in the 60%. Whether that is enought to make a monopoly claim is debatable, but I assume it is enough to argue abuse of dominant market position. Regarding your laws paragraph, I do agree that "free market" doesn't really work at the level that the US currently is. There are a lot of problems I have with how the market in the US is regulated (or rather lack thereof), but I don't live there but in the EU, which I honestly am glad of.