3 ms·
The car absolutely did exist, just not in great numbers. The article even has photographic proof of its existence. Concept vehicles like this are typically bu
by kube-system 2y ago
The car absolutely did exist, just not in great numbers. The article even has photographic proof of its existence.
Concept vehicles like this are typically built one-off and showcased at manufacturer auto shows. Some of them later go into mass production, and some of them don't.
- jccc 2y agoThat would be an excellent point for a headline that says, “This Never-Sold Concept Car Had The Wildest Dashboard You’ve Never Seen.” Obviously, such a truthful headline would get much fewer clicks. The actual headline intentionally wants us to think they’re going to show us the “Wildest” Knight Rider car that people were driving in the 80s. (Maybe they were rare, maybe you were too young to have seen them, but we have pics! Click here!)
- kube-system 2y agoNothing about the headline stated or even implied it was a production vehicle. It literally does say, "You’ve Never Seen" it. I immediately presumed it was a concept car from the headline. If you presumed otherwise, that just might be your unfamiliarity with the subject matter.
- jccc 2y agoOf course a clickbait headline does not literally lie. A clickbait headline elides, omits key information strategically, deliberately creating a far juicier story in the minds of readers than is justified by the actual post-click article. Key information like the fact that no one ever bought and drove this car on the road. I don’t think a headline gets immunity from being called clickbait if it successfully dupes only those people insufficiently familiar with its particular subject matter. Clickbait gets under the noses of such people by design.