4 ms·

That would be nice, though modern official architecture (and art) always ends up quite ugly and appalling, so it'd only be nice with proper judges (quite rare a

by kaliqt 2y ago

That would be nice, though modern official architecture (and art) always ends up quite ugly and appalling, so it'd only be nice with proper judges (quite rare apparently). Architecture and art done on ArtStation alone is superior to anything that is funded by your local government usually.

lupusreal 2y ago
Have the event judged by a panel of locals selected from the general population by lottery.
- dagw 2y ago
  Why not have all judging panels selected like this? I'd love to see 6 people chosen at random judging the dressage based entirely on whatever they happen think dressage should be judged on. And at the same times the riders are trying to alter their routine based on what they think someone who knows nothing about dressage would want to see in a dressage competition.
  - input_sh 2y ago
    Yes, why wouldn't those that trained some disciplines for years want to have their fate decided by complete randoms with no judging experience in their sport!?
    - dagw 2y ago
      If it's good enough for artists...
      - recursive 2y ago
        In the analogy, what are the Olympic games for art?
IIAOPSW 2y ago
>so it'd only be nice with proper judges (quite rare apparently). Taste is just nostalgia with extra steps. Whatever the prestige class was building when the present adults were kids (or during a noteworthy economic boom time) is "good architecture", and everything else sucks.