While I agree, that ship seems to have sailed for the time being. There will be a lot of very dubious code for the coming years/decade. Currently using Claude P

While I agree, that ship seems to have sailed for the time being. There will be a lot of very dubious code for the coming years/decade. Currently using Claude Projects or Copilot Workspace, you can write fully working software, but every time you ask for a change, it will double up, mess up etc some part of the code. You can just ask to fix it, but if you have the following: - fix A please - hmm, ok A fixed, B broken; fix B please - hmm, ok B fixed, A now a bit broken, fix A please - A & B working But when you check the code, you often see that it wrote code for A that broke B, then it fixed B while leaving the code for A, now basically dead code but not necessarily detectable. Then it wrote code for A, again, after the code of B and the user thinks all is fine as it works. And this happens 1000x / day in normal projects. I see it everywhere. Good for me (my company troubleshoots and fixes code/systems), but not for the world.