3 ms·
I don't see why it's not the critics' onus to produce better benchmarks.
by duaneb 14y ago
I don't see why it's not the critics' onus to produce better benchmarks.
- cantankerous 14y agoThat's like one posting a bad argument on here, another saying it's a bad argument, then the first saying it's not a bad argument because the second hasn't supplied a better argument to replace the first's argument. Nobody has to accept this benchmark as indicative of anything if they don't find it robust enough.
- amalcon 14y agoThe burden of proof is always on the one making the claim, not on the one refuting it. See Russell's Teapot, et al.