> “If you’re telling customers that you’re giving them one thing, but instead giving them something else, then that seems like a paradigm case of a deceptive bu

> “If you’re telling customers that you’re giving them one thing, but instead giving them something else, then that seems like a paradigm case of a deceptive business practice,” said Brian Berkey, associate professor of legal studies and business ethics I'm not convinced the link is so direct and easy to prove. If an eBay seller sends you a rock instead of a gold ring you don't really have a claim against eBay. OnlyFans does not employ these chatters nor is explicitly aware of their existence. They are a very thin intermediary that offers communication, moderation, safety and payment services, but do not produce the content, nor do they employ the obviously freelance performers. It's very likely they have lines in their performer TOS that forbid models from such misrepresentation, while securing a chat session to ensure a certain person is the one typing is a very hard problem to solve and by no means an industry standard approach.