4 ms·
Using their browser business to artificially force the market to be more kind to their advertising business? Google's monopoly can't get broken up soon enough.
by StableAlkyne 2y ago
Using their browser business to artificially force the market to be more kind to their advertising business?
Google's monopoly can't get broken up soon enough.
- Rinzler89 2y agoBut think of the poor shareholders. How will they get any returns without Google's monopoly?
- johnnyanmac 2y agowas a pretty obvious eventuality when manifest V3 was announced. I knew I needed to jump off ASAP at that moment. They already use that leverage to reject any kinds of extensions on their store that extends on Youtube, after all.
- safety1st 2y agoIt's pretty interesting how this stuff is still going on after a judge has just ruled that it's illegal. The Microsoft monopoly case really did change the company in the sense that it made them a lot more cautious and bureaucratic even before the ruling came down. This ruling doesn't seem to have changed anything at Google yet. Amit Mehta's comments indicate that he was nonplussed about how thoroughly and knowingly Google has been destroying evidence for years, another thing which for all their faults, Microsoft and I suspect IBM before them didn't really do, knowing that the courts would catch on sooner or later. Google is special, it's like this company is committed to criminality in its DNA.
- karmakaze 2y agoThere's no 'browser business'. How does that model work, give away free web browsers on desktop and mobile, then... It certainly helped when they were making what was needed for apps like Gmail, Docs, etc.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]