2 ms·
Exactly. Part of the evaluation has to be whether the disaster was due to what should have been preventable. If you're compromised by an APT, no liability. Muc
by btilly 2y ago
Exactly.
Part of the evaluation has to be whether the disaster was due to what should have been preventable. If you're compromised by an APT, no liability. Much like a building is not supposed to stand up to dynamite. But someone fat fingered a configuration, you had no proper test environment as part of deployment, and hospitals and 911 systems went down because of it?
There is a legal term that should apply. That term is "criminal negligence". But that term can't apply for the simple reason that there is no generally accepted standard by which you could be considered negligent.