3 ms·
This is true, but irrelevant. The human visual system adapts to reconstruct what it believes a surface color is, based on the colors of the overall image. Cla
by sillysaurus 14y ago
This is true, but irrelevant. The human visual system adapts to reconstruct what it believes a surface color is, based on the colors of the overall image. Classic example:
http://content.screencast.com/users/shawnpresser/folders/Jing/media/f9798a32-dfba-4946-b45b-44795db321c1/2012-06-16_2140.png http://content.screencast.com/users/shawnpresser/folders/Jin...
A and B are exactly the same RGB color, even though they appear completely different.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Sen1HTu5o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Sen1HTu5o
So in truth, yes, the LCD spectrum is limited, but you can still achieve an overall "look and feel" regardless of the smaller gamut. Our perception of any specific color is dominated by other colors around it in the scene.
- twelvechairs 14y agoThats a slightly separate point. Your mind sees colour in many different ways. One of these (at a higher-level) is as shapes and relative-tones as you describe. Other parts of the brain and the body work at a much lower-level however, which is why (for instance) people innately enjoy natural-sunshine and get depressed when sitting inside under lightbulbs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasonal_affective_disorder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasonal_affective_disorder is one, well researched side of this).
- nopassrecover 14y agoThat's probably more Vitamin D differences than colour.
- twelvechairs 14y agoVitamin D basically IS presence of/lack of colour - because it is only produced when certain wavelengths of light ('colours') are present. As well as vitamin D there are also many other chemicals in the body which need certain wavelengths of light to be produced. See for instance web.mit.edu/dick/www/pdf/286.pdf (an 1980s but reasonable article not written by quacks)
- nopassrecover 14y agoThat's an interesting thought and cheers for the link. I guess I tend to think of colours as only within the visual spectrum, and my understanding was that the chemical reactions were from UV and above, but I can see now that's kind of arbitrary thinking.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- huggah 14y agoI agree with nopassrecover. Could you please provide a citation to research that demonstrates that we innately get depressed when not exposed to sunlight because we can't enjoy color differences as much? That seems to be a pretty audacious statement, and I've never heard it before.
- batista 14y agoThe "innately get depressed when not exposed to sunlight" I've read many times, and has been researched a lot, plenty of papers about. The "because we can't enjoy color differences as much" part, not so much, if ever.
- twelvechairs 14y agoTo respond a little - I was trying to use "innately get depressed when not exposed to sunlight" as an example of something well researched showing that light affects people physically in ways that are not just 'seeing shape and contrast' (which sillysaurus' post seemed to be stating was the be-all and end-all of colour and vision). Its a slightly different point to 'enjoying colour differences', which of course we do. Compare a sunset in real life (even behind a window) with that in a photo - for instance....
- batista 14y ago>To respond a little - I was trying to use "innately get depressed when not exposed to sunlight" as an example of something well researched showing that light affects people physically in ways that are not just 'seeing shape and contrast' It could not be light as such though. It could be warmth from the sun that makes people depressed when not exposed to sunlight, or vitamin deficiency (some vitamins need sunlight to be usable).