3 ms·
Qts doc is good but REALLY lacks in the details. For example how things composit with each other is generally undocumented and the fact that their codebase is q
by ghosty141 2y ago
Qts doc is good but REALLY lacks in the details. For example how things composit with each other is generally undocumented and the fact that their codebase is quite old and full of techdebt makes that part very annoying for advanced use.
An example: how in QML the Repeater element works inside an ObjectModel.
- jclay 2y agoI agree. Topics like “how is the lifetime of a QObject exposed to the QML engine managed?” lack coverage and clarity. On the surface it is simple, but in practice it’s an extremely complex topic that has been a source for many bugs in our medium to large QML desktop app. We contribute upstream a bit and we had documentation updates to clarify the stability of pointers to QHash elements rejected. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Personally, we superbuild bleeding edge Qt with the source code in tree so that it’s trivial to go to definition and inspect behavior. Makes the experience substantially better.