I can't reply to dang's informational post, but in light of the new claims from defcon, isn't the previous discussion title potentially defamatory? > (dang) Pr

I can't reply to dang's informational post, but in light of the new claims from defcon, isn't the previous discussion title potentially defamatory? > (dang) Previous related thread: Defcon stiffs badge HW vendor, drags FW author offstage during talk