3 ms·

Interesting observations.- PS. I really appreciate the thoroughness with which you are approaching this, wanted to add to what I said about "discernment lattic

Interesting observations.- PS. I really appreciate the thoroughness with which you are approaching this, wanted to add to what I said about "discernment lattice" What I was wondering - if this helps - is if the term "discernment lattice" being (at least in my humble understanding) a lesser known or not standard concept might not be having a negative effect on prompt results - where, for example, a simpler description of the concept might yield better results? (ie. the AI might not know or have difficulty understanding what you mean by "discernment lattice" so a simpler description of it - 'multi dimensional matrix of knowledge cross referenced from all [these] knowledge domains' - might yield better results? That was basically what I was wondering ... PS. I now see - if I am correct - that "discernment lattice" is not just a term you are using in prompts, but a "structure" you are building - and then perhaps referring to - from AI-provided context "comfig" or state files ...

samstave 2y ago
Let me clarify where Discernment Lattice comes from: Aiming to be a succinct, stoicly direct about the archetype directive to give the AI I came up with "Discernment Lattice" to describe how I wanted the AI to lens its take on the problem. And I put it that way due to me attempting to keep a bot focused on specifically the domain I wanted - and I was looking for better, more precise words to scaffold the request at. So I told it to use the archetype of a particular Professional Career/Degree/Position as the constraints as its "Discernment Lattice" - had not thought of that phrase prior, I just knew it reflected my intent. -- After you pointed that out, I didnt want to ask what a discernment lattice was because I didnt know if it existed - so instead I asked it to "describe its discernment lattice it used" for the questions about yesterday and it gave me a great description of what it used. AHA! It is a thing... So then I asked it to tell me what a discernment lattice is, using a discernment lattice. I usually close a prompt with "review, explain, propose, confirm, execute" which forces them to tell me what they are about to do... but now Ill add this to the discernment lattice template I want it to refer to for workflow prompts. ____ >>...from AI-provided context "comfig" or state files . Yes, this -- Basically I want a way to guide the prompt in a structured manner that as a part of the prompt it just needs to lookup the Discernment Domain file I reference, to get the deeper context of the question I want to ask. So, if I have a discernment domain for what I want to look at when I mention "From CORPO import NVIDIA, OIA, MSFT, INTC and from OPENSECRETS investments show LAW affects STOCK but these can be other workflows plans within plans... https://i.imgur.com/Fi5GYRl.png https://i.imgur.com/Fi5GYRl.png https://i.imgur.com/fRyVDR5.png https://i.imgur.com/fRyVDR5.png https://i.imgur.com/seTHs5R.png https://i.imgur.com/seTHs5R.png https://i.imgur.com/wlne9pT.png https://i.imgur.com/wlne9pT.png --- > it described something sufficiently much like it, that you concluded the AI knew what a "discernment lattice" was ... ? Is this wrong? Yeah - now that I see the defenition, which reflects not only my initial intent, but also structures it in a sound format, and it meets the esoteric functino of informed intent. Meaning that, like an agent - its really to be an agent of "From The Perspective Of" and more intrinsicly "DiscernTrueConnBtwn[A,B,C,D] as informed by Lattice[X,Y,Z] where [N] can be better understood, discovered, assessed, grok'd and gleaned. With a repo of Lattices which can then be used in conjunction with txtai workflow functions: https://github.com/neuml/txtai/tree/master/examples https://github.com/neuml/txtai/tree/master/examples Where the Lattice could be a series of things that you want to connect people places and things -- I like the AI FootPrint example best - so I am going to attempt to build that first.
- Bluestein 2y ago
  > so instead I asked it to "describe its discernment lattice it used" for the questions about yesterday and it gave me a great description of what it used. AHA! It is a thing... So, if I am understanding you correctly, by forcing the AI to describe - and, it did - its (so called) "discernment lattice", it described something sufficiently much like it, that you concluded the AI knew what a "discernment lattice" was ... > So then I asked it to tell me what a discernment lattice is, using a discernment lattice. I'd be curious to see what it replied to this.-

samstave 2y ago

Let me clarify where Discernment Lattice comes from: Aiming to be a succinct, stoicly direct about the archetype directive to give the AI I came up with "Discernment Lattice" to describe how I wanted the AI to lens its take on the problem. And I put it that way due to me attempting to keep a bot focused on specifically the domain I wanted - and I was looking for better, more precise words to scaffold the request at. So I told it to use the archetype of a particular Professional Career/Degree/Position as the constraints as its "Discernment Lattice" - had not thought of that phrase prior, I just knew it reflected my intent. -- After you pointed that out, I didnt want to ask what a discernment lattice was because I didnt know if it existed - so instead I asked it to "describe its discernment lattice it used" for the questions about yesterday and it gave me a great description of what it used. AHA! It is a thing... So then I asked it to tell me what a discernment lattice is, using a discernment lattice. I usually close a prompt with "review, explain, propose, confirm, execute" which forces them to tell me what they are about to do... but now Ill add this to the discernment lattice template I want it to refer to for workflow prompts. ____ >>...from AI-provided context "comfig" or state files . Yes, this -- Basically I want a way to guide the prompt in a structured manner that as a part of the prompt it just needs to lookup the Discernment Domain file I reference, to get the deeper context of the question I want to ask. So, if I have a discernment domain for what I want to look at when I mention "From CORPO import NVIDIA, OIA, MSFT, INTC and from OPENSECRETS investments show LAW affects STOCK but these can be other workflows plans within plans... https://i.imgur.com/Fi5GYRl.png https://i.imgur.com/Fi5GYRl.png https://i.imgur.com/fRyVDR5.png https://i.imgur.com/fRyVDR5.png https://i.imgur.com/seTHs5R.png https://i.imgur.com/seTHs5R.png https://i.imgur.com/wlne9pT.png https://i.imgur.com/wlne9pT.png --- > it described something sufficiently much like it, that you concluded the AI knew what a "discernment lattice" was ... ? Is this wrong? Yeah - now that I see the defenition, which reflects not only my initial intent, but also structures it in a sound format, and it meets the esoteric functino of informed intent. Meaning that, like an agent - its really to be an agent of "From The Perspective Of" and more intrinsicly "DiscernTrueConnBtwn[A,B,C,D] as informed by Lattice[X,Y,Z] where [N] can be better understood, discovered, assessed, grok'd and gleaned. With a repo of Lattices which can then be used in conjunction with txtai workflow functions: https://github.com/neuml/txtai/tree/master/examples https://github.com/neuml/txtai/tree/master/examples Where the Lattice could be a series of things that you want to connect people places and things -- I like the AI FootPrint example best - so I am going to attempt to build that first.

Bluestein 2y ago
> so instead I asked it to "describe its discernment lattice it used" for the questions about yesterday and it gave me a great description of what it used. AHA! It is a thing... So, if I am understanding you correctly, by forcing the AI to describe - and, it did - its (so called) "discernment lattice", it described something sufficiently much like it, that you concluded the AI knew what a "discernment lattice" was ... > So then I asked it to tell me what a discernment lattice is, using a discernment lattice. I'd be curious to see what it replied to this.-