> This is only a common mistake to the subset of people who labor under the delusion that we have actually stumbled upon Generalized Artificial Intelligence Th

> This is only a common mistake to the subset of people who labor under the delusion that we have actually stumbled upon Generalized Artificial Intelligence That is technically true but deceptive: that subset is enormous! Skim any HN thread and you'll see many people talking about reasoning ability or how we just need a little more magic sauce and the "hallucination problem" will be solved. And a lot of what people say in this vein is not even wrong. And that's just HN. Non-technical users are of course going to assume that if it looks like a duck and is dressed up as a duck by its creators, then it's a duck. Why wouldn't they? So I would claim that the subset is a majority.