4 ms·
> Not to be negative or anything but [pure shade] I'm gonna bet that my mom has had a website since before you were born*. She was taking fortran classes in t
by klyrs 2y ago
> Not to be negative or anything but [pure shade]
I'm gonna bet that my mom has had a website since before you were born*. She was taking fortran classes in the 60s. Your ageist attitude is pretty gross. So what if she had help? Another bet, you can't program without the help of online resources and/or a chatbot either.
* given the dates on your resume, there's a very good chance I'm correct in this
- xandrius 2y ago[flagged]
- sweeter 2y agoyou are being just as rude as the other person, if not more, buddy. There is a much better and constructive way to make this point. Also, the title says that she is "learning to code" so its not unreasonable to say that she probably isn't handling the website stuff... Also, the commenter is making a conjecture about the veracity of OP, not the mother per se.
- eltoxo 2y agoI am old myself. It is not ability to learn with age that is suspicious it is wanting to share it like this and it would be a clever marketing move. I will learn new things until the day I can't. I am currently learning the Stan language but I am not going to write a medium article "What happens when an old man attempts to learn Stan?"
- klyrs 2y agoI bet you could write that article, regardless of programming experience, and tell a compelling story. Different people share different parts of themselves online, and I think that's okay.
- rfl890 2y agoWhat a spiteful comment over a little skepticism
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- klyrs 2y agoI'd characterize the original comment as a cynical accusation of shilling, so I'm quite curious what you read as "spite" in mine. Must I point out that I, too, use external resources whilst programming?
- martin293 2y ago> > Not to be negative or anything but [absolutely justified skepticism based on how much various publicity stunts have been done] Your comment is also much much ruder than the one you're replying to.