4 ms·
I was talking specifically about Generativ AI, not text-to-speech or speech-to-text since I don't consider those to be generative AI in the Callovian sense that
by Rinzler89 2y ago
I was talking specifically about Generativ AI, not text-to-speech or speech-to-text since I don't consider those to be generative AI in the Callovian sense that's pushed nowadays and I don't want to be all pedantic about it and start splitting hairs on what technically is and what isn't, just keeping the mainstream frame of what the device manufacturers claim to be gen-AI.
- alephnerd 2y ago> not text-to-speech or speech-to-text since I don't consider those to be generative AI Plenty of TTS, STT, Autocorrect, etc applications are now leveraging LLMs like LLAMA. Functionally, GenAI is just a reskin around "NLP" like Siri. > keeping the mainstream frame of what the device manufacturers claim to be gen-AI If you're leveraging an LLM, it's safe to call it a GenAI product
- halJordan 2y agoIt's being shoved down your throat, but even with such a close view you have no idea what it is. And don't want to discuss it because that's "pedantic"?
- Rinzler89 2y agoWhere did I say you can't discuss it? Feel free to discuss it if you want. Why do you need my permission? You'll just do it without me, since you seem to have a chip on your shoulder for no reason and I don't want to reward such attitudes. I just clarified the gen-AI meaning I used in the context of my comment which is also the context manufacturers are referring to, and not the scientific definitions the AI experts are thinking about since your average consumer has no idea about ML and transformers and all the inner working of what they call AI.