3 ms·
Did anybody with a passing familiarity with the technology not know this? There's a reason people don't trust their IP to public chat assistants, ya know. It'
by klyrs 2y ago
Did anybody with a passing familiarity with the technology not know this? There's a reason people don't trust their IP to public chat assistants, ya know. It's because they're remorselessly siphoning our data for training purposes. And you've agreed to let them use your inputs for anything they please.
- ec109685 2y agoThat’s not what is happening here. Instead, the user’s voice output during the session is used to generate later sound by the model accidentally.
- klyrs 2y agoNo, I get that. But that's the thing about LLMs, isn't it? They're good at filling in the next token to make a plausible-looking conversation. And if the machine doesn't expect you to be done talking, why would it not just carry on in your voice?
- visarga 2y ago> And you've agreed to let them use your inputs for anything they please. This has always been the Google and FaceBook deal - your data for services, and the AI assistant deal remains the same. I believe people will flock to the best AI with their data, handing it on a silver platter. Will they spend half a second thinking about privacy or prefer immediate results? When you know your competition uses AI, you aim to have just as much AI assistance or more.
- peddling-brink 2y agoI was under the impression that multiple separate models were in use. I assumed it was something like whisper that converted the user’s input to text then an LLM then text to speech. I hadn’t realized this was all in one model. Wild stuff.