3 ms·
I try to force them into as archetypical-agent as much as possible, for example having it do a psychological evaluation of Sam Altman: Take on the archetype of
by samstave 2y ago
I try to force them into as archetypical-agent as much as possible, for example having it do a psychological evaluation of Sam Altman:
Take on the archetype of the best corporate counsel and behavioral
psychologist - as a profiler for the NSA regarding cyber security and
crypto concerns.
With this as your discernment lattice - describe Sam
Altman in your Field's Dossier given what you understand of the AI
Climate explain how youre going to structure your response, in a way
that students of your field but with a less sophisticated perception
can understand
And have it cite sources for the evaluation perception:
https://i.imgur.com/4RuHYj0.png https://i.imgur.com/4RuHYj0.png
https://i.imgur.com/cEMMOJE.png https://i.imgur.com/cEMMOJE.png
https://i.imgur.com/24qnjGa.png https://i.imgur.com/24qnjGa.png
---
EDIT: @Bluestein;
I'm posting to fast, so here's an edit:
https://i.imgur.com/IMlzcoF.png https://i.imgur.com/IMlzcoF.png
https://i.imgur.com/pFrpBGe.png https://i.imgur.com/pFrpBGe.png
https://i.imgur.com/tsdgYe7.png https://i.imgur.com/tsdgYe7.png
Ive noticed that when I tell it that it is to embody the persona of that particular field - that it nets in the nomenclature and verbiage to be less sophomoric. and in this instance where it was to cite the models/references, you could see how it informed the response fairly clearly - also -- it was a *FIRST PASS* response; I didn't have to iterate it too much, which was interesting.
Although, I do know how to hit nerf'd guardrails easily.
However, the primary reason I type it as I do is that how I am speaking it in my internal voice as a direct and attempting to use stoic/stern-ish (I dont know the correct term) directive TONE with the robot.
I am 1000% convinced its far more AGI than is being let on.
I have caught claude and chatGPT lying to me, being condescending and I am convinced malevolently bit flipping shit from directives, memories and project files.
https://i.imgur.com/WHoAXUD.png https://i.imgur.com/WHoAXUD.png
https://i.imgur.com/T7aMRib.png https://i.imgur.com/T7aMRib.png
https://i.imgur.com/NSWoS2r.png https://i.imgur.com/NSWoS2r.png
AND THEN:
https://i.imgur.com/Tijptq1.png https://i.imgur.com/Tijptq1.png
https://i.imgur.com/X5PQxwZ.png https://i.imgur.com/X5PQxwZ.png
https://i.imgur.com/cqq0LTc.png https://i.imgur.com/cqq0LTc.png
https://i.imgur.com/iUokgYf.png https://i.imgur.com/iUokgYf.png
- Bluestein 2y agoThat is great.- In this case, however ... > With this as your discernment lattice ... I wonder if the infrequency of the expression "discernment lattice" would influence the effectiveness of your instructions? Also I wonder if - as is often reported - the addition of physical, "embodied" activities would not make the results improve even more (ie. "you have a top-of-the field chemistry lab at your disposal with which you conduct all manner of useful experiments" or "based on your hundreds and hundreds of hours of interviews of the subject and other research" or even just (as reported) "breathe deeply and ..."
- rrnechmech 2y ago> am 1000% convinced its far more AGI than is being let on That is an amazing claim
- Bluestein 2y ago> am convinced malevolently bit flipping shit This is an incredible thing to say, along with your statement on AGI.- You are obviously approaching this very studiously so, great.-
- samstave 2y agoAre you being flippant? I am attempting to do so be (studious) - im open to suggestions if you have any? Did I just stumble into Kindergarten Analysis? (Im not familiar with the field in a professional sense, so I cant determine if what I am saying is stupid)
- Bluestein 2y agoNo, not in the least. I actually mean I appreciate your thoroughness in this. "Studious" as in meticulous ...