4 ms·
Unclear. Current evidence is that nukes are insufficient, and given the non-trivial chance that the next U.S. administration would pull out of NATO, it’s not ev
by macintux 2y ago
Unclear. Current evidence is that nukes are insufficient, and given the non-trivial chance that the next U.S. administration would pull out of NATO, it’s not even obvious that the nukes would be a factor.
- exe34 2y agoit's okay, the UK and France have enough between us to glass Moscow.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Current evidence is that nukes are insufficient, and given the non-trivial chance that the next U.S. administration would pull out of NATO Isn’t this evidence of nukes being necessary?
- macintux 2y agoIt’s not evidence of nukes being sufficient, which was the original question.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> It’s not evidence of nukes being sufficient Someone else’s nukes being insufficient. The last few years have shown nuclear powers are inviolable, to the point of causing allies of non-nuclear powers being violated by them drawing red lines in the violator’s defence.
- exe34 2y agoalthough over the last week, the Kievan Rus has been liberating Kursk from the Grand Duchy of Moscow.