The wording of SB6251 seems rather confusing to me -- I wonder if the intent was to make it intentionally vague. As it was written, if the only qualification i

The wording of SB6251 seems rather confusing to me -- I wonder if the intent was to make it intentionally vague. As it was written, if the only qualification is that "an individual who is less than eighteen" "must be depicted", then I would think that the Seattle Public Library would clearly be guilty of dozens of these felonies, for all of the movies with underage nudity that you can see on their own webpage that they make available to borrow, like the Academy Award-winning "American Beauty".