3 ms·
This is what happens when you take an engineer mindset to complex social interactions and try to see if you can engineer your way out of it. For the ML Engineer
by sashank_1509 2y ago
This is what happens when you take an engineer mindset to complex social interactions and try to see if you can engineer your way out of it. For the ML Engineer out there, this is like trying symbolic AI for natural language understanding, it will keep creating weird edge cases that humans will exploit and make the dating app useless.
>Men pay for access.
This is just a bad idea, men are probably fine with it but no woman wants a man that does this when there are men that don’t need to pay for a dating app. Being forced to pay, indicates only 2 options, either 1 you’re a “loser” not desirable by other females or 2 you’re a “player” who just wants to get on with as many girls as possible. This stigma can reduce if there are say >30-40% of single males on the app, but when starting out it can be a deal breaker for the women on the app.
> Compatibility Questions
The problem is the questions that really matter, most people do not want to share (even after entering a relationship, people don’t share this, much less an online form). George gives an example of this himself, in the body count section, most women won’t be comfortable sharing this. Other examples of potential dealbreakers, how much a man earns? How much do you value your job? How much do you value your family? How do you deal with stress? How responsible are you? Etc etc
These are not things people share, some are even hard to articulate but all are important in some form to determine compatibility. People also rarely know what questions actually matter in a relationship, the average guy/girl will focus on stuff that does not matter at all in the long term.
>Design app like CRM
Maybe, some of these up changes are good. They don’t seem very consequential as they are mostly UX changes, some of the review ideas seem bad and will be gamed.
Overall, the only good dating system is a social club / society that brings like minded, compatible people together, preferably has a few people with excellent intuition that actively (but secretly) play the role of a match-maker and facilitates natural social interactions among its members. Something churches used to do in the past to reasonable success. Apparently people are trying to do that with running clubs in the bay. But it’s undeniable that these ancient social structures are disappearing without a better replacement and we’re all the less off for it.
- yard2010 2y agoIt sounds like the problem is inherent - people are lying about themselves, about their lifestyle, about who they really are, mostly online but the same in real life. I found that it's better to be more open and transparent. It might hurt the chances, but it filters many people that can't seem to comprehend the life complexity.
- wakawaka28 2y ago>This is just a bad idea, men are probably fine with it but no woman wants a man that does this when there are men that don’t need to pay for a dating app. Being forced to pay, indicates only 2 options, either 1 you’re a “loser” not desirable by other females or 2 you’re a “player” who just wants to get on with as many girls as possible. This stigma can reduce if there are say >30-40% of single males on the app, but when starting out it can be a deal breaker for the women on the app. Not true! On the surface it makes sense but some people really just value their time and don't want to go mingle with random people indefinitely to find someone. If you move to a new city especially, where are you going to meet singles, even as an attractive guy? Then you have to be talented enough to break the ice. Let's put it another way. What is your time worth? When you make $100+ per hour with not so much free time, would you pay a little to cut the crap? I wish I could find an affordable matchmaker that was not a scam or working exclusively with rich people.